Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150136›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2025

Genomic Selection for Economic Traits in Inner Mongolia Cashmere Goats by Integrating GWAS Prior Information.

Haijiao Xi, Qi Xu, Huanfeng Yao, Zihao Shen, Bohan Zhou, Qi Lv, Jinquan Li, Ruijun Wang, Yanjun Zhang, Rui Su and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Haijiao XiCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Qi XuCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Huanfeng YaoCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Zihao ShenCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Bohan ZhouCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Qi LvCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1513-8921
Jinquan LiKey Laboratory of Goat and Sheep Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010018, China.
Ruijun WangCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Yanjun ZhangCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Rui SuCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8386-7408
Zhiying WangCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8710-319X

Funding

China Agriculture Research System 2023ZD0405102China Agriculture Research System CARS-39Department of Science and Technology of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2023ZD0405102Department of Science and Technology of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region BR251201Department of Science and Technology of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region NJYT22038Department of Science and Technology of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region NMGIRT2322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accuracy of genomic selection has a significant impact on the selection of superior individuals in livestock. Studies have reported that integrating GWAS information can improve the accuracy of genomic prediction. In this study, phenotypic data, systematic environmental data, and genotypic data of important economic traits (cashmere yield, cashmere diameter, body weight, and cashmere length) of Inner Mongolia cashmere goats were utilized. Based on the results of a previous genome-wide association study that considered additive and dominance effects, the top 5%, top 10%, top 15%, and top 20% of loci were extracted as prior marker information. The genomic breeding values for each trait were estimated using the GBLUP-GA method based on GWAS prior information, and the accuracy of genomic prediction was further evaluated using a five-fold cross-validation method. The results showed that the contribution of significant loci to the genetic variance of each trait gradually increased with an increase of the number of integrated loci. The genetic variance contribution rates of significant loci to cashmere yield, cashmere diameter, body weight, and cashmere length were 64-71%, 47-57%, 76-82%, and 66-80%, respectively. The additive heritability estimates for cashmere yield, cashmere diameter, body weight, and cashmere length using GWAS prior information were 0.252-0.266, 0.297-0.580, 0.305-0.330, and 0.107-0.117, respectively. These values were higher than those obtained using the traditional G matrix constructed from all loci, with increases of 0.052-0.066, 0.007-0.29, 0.134-0.159, and 0.015-0.025, respectively. The results of genomic prediction accuracy showed that when 5% of the GWAS prior information was integrated, the highest genomic prediction accuracy was achieved for cashmere yield (0.8156), body weight (0.8361), and cashmere length (0.7571). When 20% of the GWAS prior information was integrated, the genomic prediction accuracy for cashmere diameter was 0.8074, which was significantly higher than that at other levels. Additionally, it was found that the dominance heritability for cashmere diameter, body weight, and cashmere length was very small and could be ignored when integrating GWAS prior information. Therefore, when integrating prior information for genomic selection of these traits, the influence of dominance effects can be disregarded.

Indexed as

dominance effectsgenomic selectionGWAS prior marker informationInner Mongolia Cashmere goats

Identifiers

PMID41150136
PMCPMC12568051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.