Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150101›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2025

Presence of Resistant

Antonino Pace, Mattia Longobardi, Tamara Pasqualina Russo, Luca Borrelli, Alessandro Fioretti, Ludovico Dipineto, Antonio Santaniello

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antonino PaceDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0177-3219
Mattia LongobardiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
Tamara Pasqualina RussoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
Luca BorrelliDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5650-7458
Alessandro FiorettiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
Ludovico DipinetoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.
Antonio SantanielloDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2872-0646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social Farming promotes mental and physical health, social inclusion, education and recreational services through agricultural and animal-related activities. The expansion of Social Farming draws attention to its potential health risks, although information on the role of animals and environments as reservoirs of pathogenic or resistant bacteria within Social Farming contexts is still limited. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the presence of potential zoonotic enterobacteria (e.g.,

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceavian speciescontact riskhuman–animal interactionone healthphenotypic resistancesocial farming serviceszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID41150101
PMCPMC12567679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.