ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
Clinical Reasoning About Timely Euthanasia of Compromised Pigs.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Criteria for timely euthanasia of compromised pigs based on expert opinion and longitudinal data collection on farm.Porcine health management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In traditional livestock care, veterinarians often face situations where they have to determine the optimal time for euthanasia to prevent unnecessary suffering and pain. To improve timely euthanasia, this article focuses on the process of decision-making from a clinical reasoning perspective. The analysis aimed to identify typical steps of reasoning and explore the interdependencies between reported symptoms. For this means, decision-making reports from an online survey and in-depth interviews were assessed by an exploratory, sequential mixed-method content analysis. A key component of the approach involved generating a network analysis in Gephi to visualize the central symptoms associated with reasoning about euthanasia. The results also present a seven-step model of reasoning that can be used to innovate training concepts. Beyond practical applications, the findings have implications for theoretical considerations. Notably, the results suggest that euthanasia is more accurately conceptualized as a "script" rather than a simple "action", highlighting the need for further exploration from the perspective of cognitive psychology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.