Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150081›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2025

Powerflow Doppler Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Mares with and Without Endometritis.

Camila Silva Costa Ferreira, Aline Emerim Pinna, Isadora Pires Ferreira Dos Santos, Maria Clara Rangel Dias, Natália Sales Leal Dos Santos, Samanta da Silva Bragueroli, Petruska Montezuma Quintino, Giovanna Brito Almeida, Bruno de Araújo Penna, Elisabeth Martins da Silva da Rocha and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Camila Silva Costa FerreiraDepartment of Animal Reproduction of the Institute of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5902-0474
Aline Emerim PinnaVeterinary Clinic and Pathology, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24220-900, RJ, Brazil.
Isadora Pires Ferreira Dos SantosDepartment of Animal Reproduction of the Institute of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, RJ, Brazil.
Maria Clara Rangel DiasDepartment of Animal Reproduction of the Institute of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-4782-4570
Natália Sales Leal Dos SantosDepartment of Animal Reproduction of the Institute of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, RJ, Brazil.
Samanta da Silva BragueroliDepartment of Animal Reproduction of the Institute of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, RJ, Brazil.
Petruska Montezuma QuintinoDepartment of Animal Reproduction of the Institute of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, RJ, Brazil.
Giovanna Brito AlmeidaVeterinary Clinic and Pathology, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24220-900, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0001-8502-7610
Bruno de Araújo PennaVeterinary Clinic and Pathology, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24220-900, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7880-9270
Elisabeth Martins da Silva da RochaVeterinary Clinic and Pathology, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24220-900, RJ, Brazil.
Guilherme Nunes de SouzaVeterinary Clinic and Pathology, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24220-900, RJ, Brazil.
Celso Guimarães BarbosaDepartment of Animal Reproduction of the Institute of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9937-2004
Vera Lucia Teixeira de JesusDepartment of Animal Reproduction of the Institute of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, RJ, Brazil.
Julio César Ferraz JacobDepartment of Animal Reproduction of the Institute of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23897-000, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are no reports on the application of Powerflow mode Doppler ultrasound (US) in the diagnosis of endometritis when evaluating mares with or without endometritis. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the blood flow of the uterine segments by Powerflow mode Doppler US, relating it to the days of the estrous cycle of mares with endometritis. The mares were separated into three groups: CG-control group with mares without endometritis; GES-group of mares with subclinical endometritis; and GEC-group of mares with clinical endometritis. With ovulation induction, the mares were monitored by transrectal B-mode US and Powerflow mode Doppler US of the uterine segments. The examinations were performed daily until the next ovulation. The subjective evaluation, performed by Powerflow mode Doppler ultrasound, proved to be efficient in detecting mares with clinical endometritis examined on days 1, 9, and 10 of the estrous cycle (

Indexed as

equinereproductionuterine pathology

Identifiers

PMID41150081
PMCPMC12568136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.