Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150047›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2025

Current Trends and Future Opportunities of AI-Based Analysis in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Imaging: A Scoping Review.

Maksim Solopov, Elizaveta Chechekhina, Viktor Turchin, Andrey Popandopulo, Dmitry Filimonov, Anzhelika Burtseva, Roman Ishchenko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maksim SolopovV.K. Gusak Institute of Emergency and Reconstructive Surgery, 283045 Donetsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7053-4428
Elizaveta ChechekhinaMedical Research and Educational Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5377-2712
Viktor TurchinV.K. Gusak Institute of Emergency and Reconstructive Surgery, 283045 Donetsk, Russia.
Andrey PopandopuloV.K. Gusak Institute of Emergency and Reconstructive Surgery, 283045 Donetsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-1869
Dmitry FilimonovV.K. Gusak Institute of Emergency and Reconstructive Surgery, 283045 Donetsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4542-6860
Anzhelika BurtsevaV.K. Gusak Institute of Emergency and Reconstructive Surgery, 283045 Donetsk, Russia.
Roman IshchenkoV.K. Gusak Institute of Emergency and Reconstructive Surgery, 283045 Donetsk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review explores the application of artificial intelligence (AI) methods for analyzing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) images. The aim of this study was to identify key areas where AI-based image processing techniques are utilized for MSCs analysis, assess their effectiveness, and highlight existing challenges. A total of 25 studies published between 2014 and 2024 were selected from six databases (PubMed, Dimensions, Scopus, Google Scholar, eLibrary, and Cochrane) for this review. The findings demonstrate that machine learning algorithms outperform traditional methods in terms of accuracy (up to 97.5%), processing speed and noninvasive capabilities. Among AI methods, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are the most widely employed, accounting for 64% of the studies reviewed. The primary applications of AI in MSCs image analysis include cell classification (20%), segmentation and counting (20%), differentiation assessment (32%), senescence analysis (12%), and other tasks (16%). The advantages of AI methods include automation of image analysis, elimination of subjective biases, and dynamic monitoring of live cells without the need for fixation and staining. However, significant challenges persist, such as the high heterogeneity of the MSCs population, the absence of standardized protocols for AI implementation, and limited availability of annotated datasets. To advance this field, future efforts should focus on developing interpretable and multimodal AI models, creating standardized validation frameworks and open-access datasets, and establishing clear regulatory pathways for clinical translation. Addressing these challenges is crucial for accelerating the adoption of AI in MSCs biomanufacturing and enhancing the efficacy of cell therapies.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningimagingmachine learningmesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID41150047
PMCPMC12564989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.