ReviewJournal of imaging2025
Current Trends and Future Opportunities of AI-Based Analysis in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Imaging: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Promises and Perspectives of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Companion and Farm Animals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cell-based therapies of autoimmune diseases in the context of artificial intelligence development.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven nano-enhanced stem cell therapy for neurodegenerative diseases: from rational design to clinical translation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review explores the application of artificial intelligence (AI) methods for analyzing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) images. The aim of this study was to identify key areas where AI-based image processing techniques are utilized for MSCs analysis, assess their effectiveness, and highlight existing challenges. A total of 25 studies published between 2014 and 2024 were selected from six databases (PubMed, Dimensions, Scopus, Google Scholar, eLibrary, and Cochrane) for this review. The findings demonstrate that machine learning algorithms outperform traditional methods in terms of accuracy (up to 97.5%), processing speed and noninvasive capabilities. Among AI methods, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are the most widely employed, accounting for 64% of the studies reviewed. The primary applications of AI in MSCs image analysis include cell classification (20%), segmentation and counting (20%), differentiation assessment (32%), senescence analysis (12%), and other tasks (16%). The advantages of AI methods include automation of image analysis, elimination of subjective biases, and dynamic monitoring of live cells without the need for fixation and staining. However, significant challenges persist, such as the high heterogeneity of the MSCs population, the absence of standardized protocols for AI implementation, and limited availability of annotated datasets. To advance this field, future efforts should focus on developing interpretable and multimodal AI models, creating standardized validation frameworks and open-access datasets, and establishing clear regulatory pathways for clinical translation. Addressing these challenges is crucial for accelerating the adoption of AI in MSCs biomanufacturing and enhancing the efficacy of cell therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.