ArticleJournal of imaging2025
A Lesion-Aware Patch Sampling Approach with EfficientNet3D-UNet for Robust Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions from 3D MRI scans is essential for diagnosis, disease monitoring, and treatment planning. However, this task remains challenging due to the sparsity, heterogeneity, and subtle appearance of lesions, as well as the difficulty in obtaining high-quality annotations. In this study, we propose Efficient-Net3D-UNet, a deep learning framework that combines compound-scaled MBConv3D blocks with a lesion-aware patch sampling strategy to improve volumetric segmentation performance across multi-modal MRI sequences (FLAIR, T1, and T2). The model was evaluated against a conventional 3D U-Net baseline using standard metrics including Dice similarity coefficient, precision, recall, accuracy, and specificity. On a held-out test set, EfficientNet3D-UNet achieved a Dice score of 48.39%, precision of 49.76%, and recall of 55.41%, outperforming the baseline 3D U-Net, which obtained a Dice score of 31.28%, precision of 32.48%, and recall of 43.04%. Both models reached an overall accuracy of 99.14%. Notably, EfficientNet3D-UNet also demonstrated faster convergence and reduced overfitting during training. These results highlight the potential of EfficientNet3D-UNet as a robust and computationally efficient solution for automated MS lesion segmentation, offering promising applicability in real-world clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.