ArticleJournal of imaging2025
AI Diffusion Models Generate Realistic Synthetic Dental Radiographs Using a Limited Dataset.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current evidence of generative artificial intelligence specifically developed for dental and maxillofacial radiology: a systematic review.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2026Pooled it
- DentalEdu-AI graph: mapping evidence-grounded and knowledge-structured AI for dental education, assessment, and accuracy.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to address the limited availability of dental radiographs for the development of Dental AI systems by creating clinically realistic synthetic dental radiographs (SDRs). Evaluation of artificially generated images requires both expert review and objective measures of fidelity. A stepwise approach was used to processing 10,000 dental radiographs. First, a single dentist screened images to determine if specific image selection criterion was met; this identified 225 images. From these, 200 images were randomly selected for training an AI image generation model. Second, 100 images were randomly selected from the previous training dataset and evaluated by four dentists; the expert review identified 57 images that met image selection criteria to refine training for two additional AI models. The three models were used to generate 500 SDRs each and the clinical realism of the SDRs was assessed through expert review. In addition, the SDRs generated by each model were objectively evaluated using quantitative metrics: Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) and Kernel Inception Distance (KID). Evaluation of the SDR by a dentist determined that expert-informed curation improved SDR realism, and refinement of model architecture produced further gains. FID and KID analysis confirmed that expert input and technical refinement improve image fidelity. The convergence of subjective and objective assessments strengthens confidence that the refined model architecture can serve as a foundation for SDR image generation, while highlighting the importance of expert-informed data curation and domain-specific evaluation metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.