ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Development of a Fully Optimized Convolutional Neural Network for Astrocytoma Classification in MRI Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Astrocytoma is the most common type of brain glioma and is classified by the World Health Organization into four grades, providing prognostic insights and guiding treatment decisions. The accurate determination of astrocytoma grade is critical for patient management, especially in high-malignancy-grade cases. This study proposes a fully optimized Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for the classification of astrocytoma MRI slices across the three malignant grades (G2-4). The training dataset consisted of 1284 pre-operative axial 2D MRI slices from T1-weighted contrast-enhanced and FLAIR sequences derived from 69 patients. To provide the best possible model performance, an extensive hyperparameter tuning was carried out through the Hyperband method, a variant of Successive Halving. Training was conducted using Repeated Hold-Out Validation across four randomized data splits, achieving a mean classification accuracy of 98.05%, low loss values, and an AUC of 0.997. Comparative evaluation against state-of-the-art pre-trained models using transfer learning demonstrated superior performance. For validation purposes, the proposed CNN trained on an altered version of the training set yielded 93.34% accuracy on unmodified slices, which confirms the model's robustness and potential use for clinical deployment. Model interpretability was ensured through the application of two Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, SHAP and LIME, which highlighted the regions of the slices contributing to the decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.