Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41150016›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

Development of Semi-Automatic Dental Image Segmentation Workflows with Root Canal Recognition for Faster Ground Tooth Acquisition.

Yousef Abo El Ela, Mohamed Badran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yousef Abo El ElaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo 11835, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-8873-0873
Mohamed BadranDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo 11835, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2487-8646

Funding

American University in Cairo SSE-MENG-M.B-FY26-MG-2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper investigates the application of image segmentation techniques in endodontics, focusing on improving diagnostic accuracy and achieving faster segmentation by delineating specific dental regions such as teeth and root canals. Deep learning architectures, notably 3D U-Net and GANs, have advanced the image segmentation process for dental structures, supporting more precise dental procedures. However, challenges like the demand for extensive labeled datasets and ensuring model generalizability remain. Two semi-automatic segmentation workflows, Grow From Seeds (GFS) and Watershed (WS), were developed to provide quicker acquisition of ground truth training data for deep learning models using 3D Slicer software version 5.8.1. These workflows were evaluated against a manual segmentation benchmark and a recent dental segmentation automated tool on three separate datasets. The evaluations were performed by the overall shapes of a maxillary central incisor and a maxillary second molar and by the region of the root canal of both teeth. Results from Kruskal-Wallis and Nemenyi tests indicated that the semi-automated workflows, more often than not, were not statistically different from the manual benchmark based on dice coefficient similarity, while the automated method consistently provided significantly different 3D models from their manual counterparts. The study also explores the benefits of labor reduction and time savings achieved by the semi-automated methods.

Indexed as

CBCTendodonticsGANground truthimage segmentationnnU-Netregion growingwatershed

Identifiers

PMID41150016
PMCPMC12565159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.