ReviewJournal of imaging2025
A Review on the Detection of Plant Disease Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Warning of Cucumber Angular Leaf Spot by Estimating Airborne Pathogen Aerosols with Particulate Matter Sensors.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An uncertainty-aware evaluation framework based on hierarchical vision transformers for robust cross-domain plant leaf disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fungal infections: Classification performance and detectability with machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Img2Variety: Image-based intraspecific varieties identification across the whole growth period.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Optimised hybrid late fusion deep learning model for cashew disease classification.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Machine learning and time-series approaches for forecasting bacterial blight of pomegranate.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- A curated dataset and lightweight deep learning framework for tea leaf disease classification.PloS one · 2026Article
- Radiomics-driven and explainable machine learning for rapid characterization of Fusarium wilt and Black Sigatoka in banana crops.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Focal-HAIN: a lightweight model with adaptive modulation and hierarchical interaction for real-time crop pest and disease monitoring.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- AGMSF-VMUNet: attention-guided multi-scale feature fusion VM-UNet for crop pest detection.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- LSL-YOLO11n: a YOLO11n-based model for maize leaf disease detection in complex field environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- YOLito: A generalizable model for automated mosquito detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The early and accurate detection of plant diseases is essential for ensuring food security, enhancing crop yields, and facilitating precision agriculture. Manual methods are labour-intensive and prone to error, especially under varying environmental conditions. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), has advanced automated disease identification through image classification. However, challenges persist, including limited generalisability, small and imbalanced datasets, and poor real-world performance. Unlike previous reviews, this paper critically evaluates model performance in both lab and real-time field conditions, emphasising robustness, generalisation, and suitability for edge deployment. It introduces recent architectures such as GreenViT, hybrid ViT-CNN models, and YOLO-based single- and two-stage detectors, comparing their accuracy, inference speed, and hardware efficiency. The review discusses multimodal and self-supervised learning techniques to enhance detection in complex environments, highlighting key limitations, including reliance on handcrafted features, overfitting, and sensitivity to environmental noise. Strengths and weaknesses of models across diverse datasets are analysed with a focus on real-time agricultural applicability. The paper concludes by identifying research gaps and outlining future directions, including the development of lightweight architectures, integration with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks (DCGANs), and improved dataset diversity for real-world deployment in precision agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.