ReviewMembranes2025
Current Progress in Advanced Functional Membranes for Water-Pollutant Removal: A Critical Review.
Review in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA-Based Environmental Remediation: Functional Principles, Material Platforms, and Future Perspectives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Next generation materials for environmental remediation through advanced mechanisms and future perspectives.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Highly Repeatable Fibrous Crack-Based Strain Sensor for Multichannel Continuous Tremor Monitoring in Parkinson's Disease and Essential Tremor.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- From Plastic Pollution to Remediation Solutions: Micro/Nanofiber-Based Strategies for Microplastic and Nanoplastic Removal.Membranes · 2026Review
- Reactive Polymeric Membranes for Advanced Water Treatment: Bridging Mechanisms, Kinetics and Scalable Deployment.Polymers · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As water pollution from dyes, pharmaceuticals, heavy metals, and other emerging contaminants continues to rise at an alarming rate, ensuring access to clean and safe water has become a pressing global challenge. Conventional water treatment methods, though widely used, often fall short in effectively addressing these complex pollutants. In response, researchers have turned to Advanced Functional Membranes (AFMs) as promising alternatives, owing to their customizable structures and enhanced performance. Among the most explored AFMs are those based on metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and electro-catalytic systems, each offering unique advantages such as high permeability, selective pollutant removal, and compatibility with advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). Notably, hybrid systems combining AFMs with electrochemical or photocatalytic technologies have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in laboratory settings. However, translating these successes to real-world applications remains a challenge due to issues related to cost, scalability, and long-term stability. This review explores the recent progress in AFM development, particularly MOF-based, CNT-based, and electro-Fenton (EF)-based membranes, highlighting their material aspects, pollutant filtration mechanisms, benefits, and limitations. It also offers insights into how these next-generation materials can contribute to more sustainable, practical, and economically viable water purification solutions in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.