Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41149807›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2025

Accelerated Screening of Wheat Gluten Strength Using Dual Physicochemical Tests in Diverse Breeding Lines.

Mehri Hadinezhad, Judith Frégeau-Reid, Makayla Giles, Jeremy Ballentine, Brittany Carkner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehri HadinezhadOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5704-1570
Judith Frégeau-ReidOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada.
Makayla GilesOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada.
Jeremy BallentineOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada.
Brittany CarknerOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introducing fast, reliable, and low-input technologies that utilize wholemeal wheat is essential for efficiently screening gluten quality in wheat breeding lines. Although the GlutoPeak Tester (GPT) has been widely studied for gluten assessment, its application in breeding programs remains underexplored. This study presents a comprehensive approach to optimizing a GPT protocol using a diverse set of genotypes collected over seven harvest years and multiple environments. To improve screening capabilities, a quick and simple protein fractionation (PF) technique was integrated into the workflow. Key GPT parameters-such as peak maximum time, maximum torque, and aggregation energy-along with the newly proposed PM-AM parameter, showed strong correlations with established quality traits. PF data, especially insoluble glutenin percentage and the ratio of insoluble to soluble glutenin, provided additional insights into gluten composition. This extensive dataset supports the use of GPT and PF as a dual, high-throughput screening tool. When applied within specific wheat classes and benchmarked against established checks, this method offers a robust strategy for ranking breeding lines based on gluten performance. The use of wholemeal samples further streamlines the process by eliminating the need for milling, making this protocol particularly suitable for early-stage selection in wheat breeding programs.

Indexed as

gluten quality assessmentGlutoPeak TesterPM-AMprotein fractionationwheat breeding lines

Identifiers

PMID41149807
PMCPMC12566020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.