ArticleMethods and protocols2025
Efficient Collection of Skin Biopsies Using the Tissue Sampling Unit
Article in Methods and protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermal tissue samples are a rich source of germplasm because they can be readily collected, frozen as part of a genebank collection, digested and cultured, and used for a variety of purposes such as genotyping or other forms of genetic research. Derived fibroblasts can also be used for somatic cell nuclear transfer, and the remaining cells can be frozen for future use. However, collection of tissues with ear notchers, scalpels, or biopsy punches can be problematic because tissue handling and the tool surfaces can contaminate the samples. Therefore, the modification of the Allflex Tissue Sampling Unit (TSU) system was explored to determine if the technology can empower rapid collection of clean samples that are easily identifiable and portable. Results indicate that the TSU system was efficient, and samples that were collected and processed for tissue culture resulted in successful derivations of fibroblasts from 7 of 11 animals. Thus, the TSU system appears to be a viable option for collecting and preserving dermal tissue for genebanking and other applications where simple, rapid collection of large quantities of samples is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.