Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41149771›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2025

Empowering Masters of Creative Problem Solvers: The Impact of STEM Professional Development Training on Teachers' Attitudes, Self-Efficacy, and Problem-Solving Skills.

Mehmet Durnali, Bayram Gökbulut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehmet DurnaliDepartment of Educational Sciences, Ereğli Faculty of Education, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Ereğli 67350, Zonguldak, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1318-9362
Bayram GökbulutDepartment of Educational Sciences, Ereğli Faculty of Education, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Ereğli 67350, Zonguldak, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7218-5900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to explore the effects of hands-on STEM training on teachers' attitudes toward STEM, their self-efficacy in implementing STEM methodologies, and their problem-solving skills. Additionally, we explored teachers' professional competence in integrating STEM applications into their instructional practices and the impact of these applications on students' 21st-century skills. The study involved 30 in-service teachers participating in a STEM training program. A nested-methods approach was adopted, combining quantitative and qualitative analyses. Pre- and post-training data were collected using Likert-type scales measuring teachers' self-efficacy, problem-solving skills, and attitudes toward STEM. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted after the training to capture teachers' perceptions and experiences. The findings indicated significant improvements in teachers' self-efficacy and problem-solving skills. Thematic analysis of interview data identified key factors influencing successful STEM implementation, including collaboration, technology integration, and social-emotional learning. Teachers also reported that the training positively influenced their students' problem-solving and critical thinking skills. This study highlights the importance of professional development in enhancing teachers' competencies for effective STEM education. The findings contribute to the literature by providing insights into teachers' first-hand experiences and perceptions regarding the impact of STEM training on their instructional practices and student learning outcomes.

Indexed as

problem solving skillsprofessional developmentself-efficacySTEMteacher training

Identifiers

PMID41149771
PMCPMC12565693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.