Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41149769›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2025

The Effects of Philosophy for Children on Children's Cognitive Development: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis.

Caiyun Wei, Lele Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caiyun WeiSchool of Education Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.
Lele ChenFaculty of Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.

Funding

National Social Science Fund of China BAA220161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amid the rise of the knowledge economy, accelerated informatization, and the emergence of artificial intelligence, Philosophy for Children (P4C) has been promoted as an effective educational project to enhance children's cognitive development, especially higher-order thinking skills. However, empirical evidence regarding its efficacy remains inconclusive. This three-level meta-analysis synthesizes 53 effect sizes derived from 33 experimental and quasi-experimental studies involving 4568 participants to assess P4C's cognitive effects and potential moderators. The results reveal a statistically significant and moderate-to-strong overall effect (

Indexed as

cognitive developmentcommunity of inquiryhigher-order thinkingPhilosophy for Childrenthree-level meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID41149769
PMCPMC12565533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.