ArticleJournal of Intelligence2025
The Interplay of Vocabulary, Working Memory, and Math Anxiety in Predicting Early Math Performance.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mathematical performance in early education is influenced by a complex interplay of cognitive and affective factors, including language skills, working memory, and anxiety. This study investigated whether working memory and math anxiety, in both explicit numerical situations (ENS) and general classroom situations (GCS), mediate the relationship between general and math-specific vocabulary and math performance in a sample of 467 second-grade students in Chile. Structural equation modelling was employed to test a dual-pathway model in which both working memory and math anxiety served as mediators between vocabulary knowledge and math performance. Results indicated that both general and math-specific vocabulary positively predicted working memory and negatively predicted math anxiety in ENS. In turn, working memory and ENS significantly predicted math outcomes, whereas GCS was not a significant predictor. Indirect effects supported a dual mediation structure, with vocabulary influencing math performance through both cognitive and affective mechanisms. Math-specific vocabulary exerted a slightly stronger total effect than general vocabulary, consistent with its closer alignment to the semantic demands of mathematical tasks. These findings suggest that vocabulary supports early mathematical learning not only by enhancing cognitive processing capacity but also by reducing anxiety in task-specific contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.