ReviewNon-coding RNA2025
microRNA Biomarkers in Paediatric Infection Diagnostics-Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Clinical Application: A Scoping Review.
Review in Non-coding RNA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MicroRNA Profiling as a Novel Tool in the Diagnostics of Late-Onset Neonatal Sepsis: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- microRNA Biomarkers in Paediatric Infection Diagnostics-Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Clinical Application: A Scoping Review.Non-coding RNA · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDistinguishing between bacterial and viral infections in children remains a significant challenge for clinicians. Traditional biomarkers have limited utility, often leading to antibiotic overprescription due to clinician uncertainty. With rising antimicrobial resistance, novel biomarkers are needed to improve diagnosis. This scoping review examines current host miRNA biomarkers for acute bacterial and viral infections in children (0-18), focusing on study methods, diagnostic metrics, and research gaps to support clinical translation.
resultsOf the 1147 articles identified, 36 studies were included. Notably, 72.2% of the studies originated from Asia, and the distribution across the paediatric age groups was relatively even. A total of 17 miRNAs were validated in at least two independent studies. Three miRNAs, hsa-miR-182-5p, hsa-miR-363-3p, and hsa-miR-206, were consistently associated with bacterial infection in children. Meanwhile, nine miRNAs were associated with viral infections: hsa-miR-155, hsa-miR-29a-3p, hsa-miR-155-5p, hsa-miR-150-5p, hsa-miR-140-3p, hsa-miR-142-3p, hsa-miR-149-3p, hsa-miR-210-3p, and hsa-miR-34a-5p. Across the 12 studies reporting diagnostic accuracy metrics, miRNA biomarkers exhibited a sensitivity ranging from 70% to 100%, and a specificity ranging from 72% to 100%. The area under the curve across the studies demonstrated a range from 0.62 to 0.99.
conclusionsThis scoping review highlights the potential of miRNA targets for diagnosing paediatric infections when studied rigorously. However, clinical translation is limited by poor adherence to STARD guidelines, lack of robust diagnostic metrics, and study heterogeneity. Many studies were set up with a case-control design, a design that, while highlighting differences, is more likely to identify non-specific biomarkers rather than those that are useful for novel clinical diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.