ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Stress Assessment of Abutment-Free and Three Implant-Abutment Connections Utilizing Various Abutment Materials: A 3D Finite Element Study of Static and Cyclic Static Loading Conditions.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Titanium Base-Free Multi-Unit Abutment Connections: A Critical Review of Prosthetic Screw Design, Biomechanical Behavior, and Clinical Performance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biomechanical Effects of Platform Diameter and Screw Length in an Abutment-Free Tissue-Level Implant System Compared with a Ti-Base Configuration: 3D Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe implant-abutment interface has been thoroughly examined due to its impact on the success of implant healing and longevity. Removing the abutment is advantageous, but it changes the biomechanics of the implant fixture and restoration. This in vitro three-dimensional finite element analytical (FEA) study aims to evaluate the distribution of von Mises stress (VMS) in abutment-free and three additional implant abutment connections composed of various titanium alloys. MATERIALS AND
methodsA three-dimensional implant-supported single-crown prosthesis model was digitally generated on the mandibular section using a combination of microcomputed tomography imaging (microCT), a computer-assisted designing (CAD) program (SolidWorks), Analysis of Systems (ANSYS), and a 3D digital scan (Visual Computing Lab). Four digital models [A (BioHorizons), B (Straumann AG), C abutment-free (Matrix), and D (TRI)] representing three different functional biomaterials [wrought Ti-6Al-4Va ELI, Roxolid (85% Ti, 15% Zr), and Ti-6Al-4V ELI] were subjected to simulated static/cyclic static loading in axial/oblique directions after being restored with highly translucent monolithic zirconia restoration. The stresses generated on the implant fixture, abutment, crown, screw, cortical, and cancellous bones were measured.
resultsThe highest VMSs were generated by the abutment-free (Model C, Matrix) implant system on the implant fixture [static (32.36 Mpa), cyclic static (83.34 Mpa)], screw [static (16.85 Mpa), cyclic static (30.33 Mpa), oblique (57.46 Mpa)], and cortical bone [static (26.55), cyclic static (108.99 Mpa), oblique (47.8 Mpa)]. The lowest VMSs in the implant fixture, abutment, screw, and crown were associated with the binary alloy Roxolid [83-87% Ti and 13-17% Zr].
conclusionsAbutment-free implant systems generate twice the stress on cortical bone than other abutment implant systems while producing the highest stresses on the fixture and screw, therefore demanding further clinical investigations. Roxolid, a binary alloy of titanium and zirconia, showed the least overall stresses in different loadings and directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.