Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41149715›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025

Effects of Implant Silver Coatings on Bone Formation in Animal Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ali Alenezi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ali AleneziDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6929-974X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveClinical statistics show that bacterial infection is a major driver of implant failure. To enhance antibacterial performance, some metallic elements, such as silver (Ag), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu), are commonly used to modify the titanium surface. Despite the promising antibacterial performance of Ag, concerns persist regarding dose-dependent cytotoxicity, systemic accumulation, and potential effects on local bone metabolism. This review aimed to investigate the effects of incorporating or coating titanium (Ti) implant surfaces with Ag on bone formation around implants.

methodsA search was undertaken using three main databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus). The search was limited to studies published within the last 20 years that involved animal experiments using endosseous implants coated with or incorporating Ag. Meta-analyses were performed for bone-to-implant contact (BIC), bone formation (BA), and bone volume (BV/TV) around the implant in control and test groups. The compared groups were subjected to similar implant surface treatments aside from the presence of silver in the test group.

resultsSixteen studies met the inclusion criteria in this study and were included. The analysis of BIC values revealed a statistically significant overall effect in favor of silver-coated implants (Z = 2.01,

conclusionsIn animal models, silver-coated Ti implants improve bone-implant contact without altering peri-implant bone volume metrics.

Indexed as

animal modelsantibacterial coatingsbone formationmeta-analysisperi-implantitissilver-coated titanium implants

Identifiers

PMID41149715
PMCPMC12565240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.