Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41149614›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2025

NAD

Ettore Vanni, Christophe Montessuit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ettore VanniPole of Cardiovascular Research, Institute of Clinical and Experimental Research, Catholic University of Louvain, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5194-6651
Christophe MontessuitDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2580-7711

Funding

Fondation Centre de Recherche Médicale Carlos et Elsie de Reuter 640Fondation Ernst et Lucie Schmidheiny NASwiss National Science Foundation IZCOZ0_182955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesStimulation of glucose uptake in response to ischemic stress is important for cardiomyocyte post-ischemic function and survival. In the diabetic myocardium chronically exposed to an excess of circulating lipids, this mechanism is impaired, making the myocardium more sensitive to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). In vitro studies have shown that exposure to fatty acids (FAs) reduces basal and stimulated glucose uptake in cardiomyocytes. Preliminary results indicate reduced NAD

methodsPrimary rat cardiomyocytes were chronically treated with the sirtuin deacetylase inhibitor nicotinamide (NAM) in absence of FAs to induce protein acetylation. Conversely, we replenished NAD

resultsSimilar to FA exposure, NAM treatment increased protein acetylation and impaired metabolic-stress-stimulated glucose uptake in cardiomyocytes. In contrast, NR supplementation reduced protein acetylation and improved metabolic-stress-stimulated glucose uptake in FA-exposed cardiomyocytes. Neither NAM nor NR influenced insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Both NAM and FAs induced hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase trifunctional enzyme subunit α (HADHA) acetylation on lysine residues K

conclusionsIn cardiomyocytes, protein hyperacetylation, resulting from either FA exposure or sirtuin inhibition, impairs metabolic-stress-stimulated glucose uptake and is associated with increased FA oxidation.

Indexed as

cardiomyocytesheartmetabolismNAD metabolitespost-translational modificationprotein acetylation

Identifiers

PMID41149614
PMCPMC12565917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.