ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
Supportive Care Needs of Patients with Breast Cancer Who Self-Identify as Black: An Integrative Review.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Black-identifying patients face many barriers to the receipt of equitable breast cancer care; however, little is currently known about the unique needs of this patient population, particularly in Canada. To address this gap, we identified and thematically grouped constructs from the published literature reporting on the needs of Black-identifying patients with breast cancer and compared these findings to a list generated through a virtual nominal consensus group (NG) attended by Canadian patients with breast cancer who self-identified as Black (n = 3). A scoping review was undertaken, and relevant citations published from database inception until January 2025 were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. The literature review yielded 34 articles from the United States and identified 15 constructs consistent with the NG, which spanned the cancer continuum from screening to survivorship. The NG identified four additional constructs that were not found in the literature: advocacy and outreach, communication and health literacy, comorbidities and personalized care, and end-of-life care. The final set of constructs was then validated and prioritized by an expert panel consisting of patients with lived experience and relevant community partner organizations (n = 9) to drive future research, advocacy, and policy work. Patient navigation was identified as the top need, with financial support, access to culturally tailored information and resources, culturally relevant care, racialized data for treatment decision-making, and emotional support identified as high-priority needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.