ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
Bevacizumab in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Alterations in peripheral blood inflammatory mediators, vascular endothelial growth factor, and serum tumor markers in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bevacizumab is often used off-label in pediatric neuro-oncology, and evidence for indications of bevacizumab use in pediatric neuro-oncology is often fragmented. Therefore, this review aims to provide an organized summary of efficacy across different types of tumors, highlight outcomes, and link findings to the underlying biology. Gaps in the literature were also identified to guide future research. We narratively synthesized various pediatric studies, and the following tumor categories were identified for discussion: low-grade glioma, high-grade glioma, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, schwannoma, medulloblastoma, radiation necrosis, and cerebral edema. Key outcomes considered included overall survival, event-free survival, progression-free survival, vision and/or hearing improvements, steroid use, quality of life, and toxicity. The greatest benefits were observed in cases such as recurrent medulloblastoma in combination with temozolomide and irinotecan, optic pathway glioma visual function, and diminished steroid use in radiation necrosis. Results were poorer in cases of newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas and diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. The medication was overall well tolerated, with adverse events like hypertension, proteinuria, and epistaxis often being manageable with surveillance. In consideration of the results, bevacizumab should be considered based on the tumor profile, and its outcome measured along functional endpoints, besides radiological evolution. Continued investigations into outcome measures, as well as combination with targeted treatments and optimizing therapy, will contribute to improving outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.