ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025
Supporting Employment After Cancer: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Vocational Integration Programme for Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer (CAYAC) survivors often face challenges entering the workforce due to long-term physical, cognitive, and psychological late effects, defined as chronic health conditions resulting from cancer and its treatments. This study evaluated a vocational integration programme that addresses these barriers and promotes psychosocial well-being. The multidisciplinary intervention combined career guidance, soft-skills training, and a paid internship. Using a mixed-method design with questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, we assessed feasibility, satisfaction, and psychosocial outcomes. Thirteen participants (mean-age-at-diagnosis: 12.9 years, SD 5.2; mean-age-at-interview: 27.2 years, SD 5.3) reported over 40 late effects, mostly of moderate severity. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), measured by the SF-12, showed a Physical Component Score mean of 45.2 (SD 9.1) and a Mental Component Score mean of 43.5 (SD 11.2), indicating greater psychological impact. The programme received high satisfaction ratings (mean 8.3/10) and was described as motivating and valuable, enhancing self-confidence and career prospects. Social support emerged as a key facilitator, while participants noted the need for flexibility and individualised pacing. Despite a limited sample size and potential recruitment bias, this study provides preliminary insights into the feasibility and perceived value of tailored vocational programmes, emphasising the importance of adaptable, socially supportive interventions for CAYAC survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.