ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Hydrogels in Heritage Conservation: A Comparative Evaluation on Composite Objects.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preliminary Assessment of BNC Membranes as Solvent Delivery Systems for the Cleaning of Mural Paintings: Comparison with Traditional Gel Systems.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ethnographic collections often incorporate composite objects consisting of various materials, including wood, textiles and metals. These objects are vulnerable to deterioration when iron fastenings corrode under humid environments, and their removal is therefore essential for the long-term preservation of artifacts. This study investigates the efficacy of the chelating agents Desferrioxamine B (DFO-B) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), applied in different gel formulations, in cleaning wooden and textile mock-ups stained with iron corrosion products. Three gel types were explored: xanthan gum, agarose and Nanorestore extra-dry gel with medium water retention (nano-MWR). The results indicated that xanthan gum exhibited the highest cleaning effectiveness but posed risks of residue deposition and surface damage due to the required clearance process. Agarose and nano-MWR gels proved to be less effective but showed potential for achieving high chelator efficacy with repeated applications. Agarose enhanced the chelators' efficacy on textiles, while nano-MWR gel performed better on even wooden surfaces. No chemical damage was detected for either substrate across gel applications. The study concludes that a single gel formulation does not achieve equivalent cleaning efficacy on the two substrates of composite objects with a defined number of applications. Agarose in a semi-rigid state enhances the efficacy of textile treatment and may achieve comparable results on wood after repeated applications. Alternatively, a combined approach using agarose for textiles and nano-MWR gel for wood may optimize chelator performance on composite artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.