ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Rational Design of Self-Healing Hydrogel with High Mechanical Strength and Self-Healing Efficiency: A Short Review.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineered novel dually cross-linked hydrogel system embedded with Apigenin-cyclodextrin complex for surgical wound healing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Preparation and characterization of self-healing nanocomposite hydrogels based on chitosan/polyethylene glycol/bacterial nanocellulose for wound dressing applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Self-healing hydrogels: mechanisms and applications in biomedical and environmental fields.Biodegradation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-healing hydrogels, a novel class of "smart" hydrogels, possess the ability to autonomously restore their network structure and mechanical properties following damage through the reconnection of a fractured three-dimensional network via reversible interactions. This characteristic enhances their safety and durability, exhibiting significant potential in biomedicine. The key determinants of self-healing hydrogels are their mechanical strength and healing efficiency. Ideally, these hydrogels exhibit both high mechanical strength and good healing efficiency. Nevertheless, an inverse relationship between the mechanical strength and self-healing efficiency of self-healing hydrogels typically exists. Thus, research is currently focused on the development of self-healing hydrogels that combine good biocompatibility, high mechanical strength, and good self-healing efficiency. This review focuses on the research progress that is being made regarding the mechanical properties and self-healing capabilities of self-healing hydrogels, where we aim to achieve a balance between self-healing performance and mechanical strength. We outline the evaluation methods for assessing self-healing performance, followed by providing a summary of recent advancements in the mechanical strength and self-healing efficiency of external-stimulus-triggered self-healing hydrogels and autonomous self-healing hydrogels. Finally, we address the challenges and prospects for the future development of self-healing hydrogels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.