Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41149283›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025

A Fluoroscopy-Free Ablation Workflow for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using a Pentaspline Pulse Field Ablation Catheter Guided by Left-Sided Intracardiac Echo Imaging and Electroanatomic Mapping: A Case Series.

Adam Mohmand-Borkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adam Mohmand-BorkowskiDepartment of Cardiology, Cape Cod Hospital, 25 Main Street, Hyannis, MA 02601, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulse field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation technology with efficacy and safety, potentially making it a preferred ablation technology for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). There is no optimal procedural workflow established to optimize efficacy, limiting the number of PFA applications and risks of the procedure. Due to the importance of optimal catheter-tissue contact for effective pulse field ablation, a workflow combining superior left atrial intracardiac echo (ICE) imaging and electroanatomic mapping (EAM) is an attractive strategy for PFA of persistent AF.

methodsA detailed procedural workflow was developed for fluoroscopy-free PFA using a pentaspline ablation catheter supported by left atrial ICE and EAM, and a case series of its execution in 30 consecutive patients with persistent AF is presented. All patients underwent pulmonary vein and posterior wall isolation as the index procedure, followed by additional ablation targeting non-pulmonary vein triggers and other inducible atrial arrhythmias.

resultsLeft atrial ICE imaging and EAM guided procedure resulted in successful isolation of the pulmonary veins and posterior wall in all patients, with additional ablation of spontaneous arrhythmias or non-pulmonary triggers if induced. There were no major complications of the procedure. Average procedure times and short-term efficacy were comparable with reported PFA outcomes using traditional imaging techniques.

conclusionsFluoroscopy-free PFA guided by left-sided ICE for persistent AF can be performed with superior catheter-tissue contact imaging in a safe manner with a comparable procedural time and short-term efficacy as reported with the use of other imaging modalities.

Indexed as

fluoroscopy-free ablationintracardiac echocardiographypentaspline catheterpersistent atrial fibrillationpulse field ablation

Identifiers

PMID41149283
PMCPMC12565276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.