ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Biomimetic Transfer Learning-Based Complex Gastrointestinal Polyp Classification.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Swarm Intelligence-Guided Hybrid Transfer Learning for Gastrointestinal Polyp Classification.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Radiomics: Current Applications and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based classification of colonoscopic images using an attention-enhanced ConvNeXt V2 architecture.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: This research investigates the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly biomimetic convolutional neural networks (CNNs), for the automatic classification of gastrointestinal (GI) polyps in endoscopic images. The study combines AI and Transfer learning techniques to support early detection of colorectal cancer by enhancing diagnostic accuracy with pre-trained models; (2) Methods: The Kvasir dataset, comprising 4000 annotated endoscopic images across eight polyp categories, was used. Images were pre-processed via normalisation, resizing, and data augmentation. Several CNN architectures, including state-of-the-art optimized ResNet50, DenseNet121, and MobileNetV2, were trained and evaluated. Models were assessed through training, validation, and testing phases, using performance metrics such as overall accuracy, confusion matrix, precision, recall, and F1 score; (3) Results: ResNet50 achieved the highest validation accuracy at 90.5%, followed closely by DenseNet121 with 87.5% and MobileNetV2 with 86.5%. The models demonstrated good generalisation, with small differences between training and validation accuracy. The average inference time was under 0.5 s on a computer with limited resources, confirming real-time applicability. Confusion matrix analysis indicates that common errors frequently occur between visually similar classes, particularly when reviewed by less-experienced medical physicians. These errors underscore the difficulty of distinguishing subtle features in gastrointestinal imagery and highlight the value of model-assisted diagnostics; (4) Conclusions: The obtained results confirm that Deep learning-based CNN architectures, combined with Transfer learning and optimisation techniques, can classify accurately endoscopic images and support medical diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.