Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41149210›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Compressive Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel Lattice Structures for Additive Manufacturing: Experimental Characterization and Numerical Modeling.

Ignacio Ríos, Laurent Duchêne, Anne Marie Habraken, Angelo Oñate, Rodrigo Valle, Anne Mertens, César Garrido, Gonzalo Pincheira, Víctor Tuninetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ignacio RíosDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile.
Laurent DuchêneDepartment ArGEnCo-MSM, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3903-5898
Anne Marie HabrakenDepartment ArGEnCo-MSM, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1838-7939
Angelo OñateDepartment of Materials Engineering (DIMAT), Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070138, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-4542-3731
Rodrigo ValleConstruction Multidisciplinary Research Group, Facultad de Arquitectura, Construcción y Medio Ambiente, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca 3460000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-5995-5926
Anne MertensMetallic Materials Science (MMS), University of Liège, Quartier Polytech 1 Allée de la Découverte 13 (B52), 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9987-8144
César GarridoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Concepción 4081112, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-0009-1665
Gonzalo PincheiraDepartment of Industrial Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, University of Talca, Camino a Los Niches Km 1, Curicó 3344158, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-5853-0448
Víctor TuninettiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811230, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-2808-0415

Funding

WBI/AGCID RI02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lattice structures produced by additive manufacturing are increasingly used in lightweight, load-bearing applications, yet their mechanical performance is strongly influenced by geometry, process parameters, and boundary conditions. This study investigates the compressive behavior of body-centered cubic (BCC) 316L stainless steel lattices fabricated by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Four relative densities (20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%) were achieved by varying the strut diameter, and specimens were built in both vertical and horizontal orientations. Quasi-static compression tests characterized the elastic modulus, yield strength, energy absorption, and mean force, while finite element simulations reproduced the deformation and hardening behavior. The experimental results showed a direct correlation between density and mechanical properties, with vertically built specimens performing slightly better due to reduced processing defects. Simulations quantified the effect of strut-joint rounding and the need for multi-cell configurations to closely match the experimental curves. Regardless of the boundary conditions, for a density of 20%, simulating a single cell underestimated stiffness because of unconstrained strut buckling. For higher densities and thicker struts, this sensitivity to boundary conditions strongly decreased, indicating the possibility of using a single cell for shorter simulations-a point rarely discussed in the literature. Both experiments and simulations confirmed Gibson-Ashby scaling for elastic modulus and yield strength, while the tangent modulus was highly sensitive to boundary conditions. The combined experimental and numerical results provide a framework for the reliable modeling and design of metallic lattices for energy absorption, biomedical, and lightweight structural applications.

Indexed as

biomedical implantsbody-centered cubic (BCC) latticecompression behaviorenergy absorptionfinite element analysis (FEA)laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)mechanical metamaterialsrelative densityselective laser melting (SLM)stainless steel 316L

Identifiers

PMID41149210
PMCPMC12561578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.