ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2025
A Learning Strategy Intervention to Promote Self-Regulation, Growth Mindset, and Performance in Introductory Mathematics Courses.
Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of integrating explicit learning-strategy instruction into gatekeeper mathematics courses to foster a math growth mindset, self-regulated learning (SRL), and improved academic performance among underrepresented minority students. The intervention was implemented across four key courses-College Algebra I/II and Calculus I/II-and incorporated evidence-based cognitive, metacognitive, and behavioral learning strategies through course materials, class discussions, and reflective assignments. Grounded in a conceptual framework linking learning-strategy instruction, growth mindset, SRL, and performance-while accounting for students' social identities-the study explores both direct and indirect effects of the intervention. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, we first collected quantitative data via pre- and post-surveys/tests and analyzed performance outcomes, followed by qualitative focus groups to contextualize the findings. Results showed no significant effects of the intervention on growth mindset or SRL, nor evidence of mediation through these constructs. The direct effect of the intervention on performance was negative, though baseline mindset, SRL, and pre-course preparedness strongly predicted outcomes. No moderation effects were detected by student identities. The findings suggest that while explicit learning-strategy instruction may not independently shift mindset or SRL in the short term, pre-existing differences in these areas are consequential for performance. Qualitative findings provided further context for understanding how students engaged with the strategies and how instructor implementation shaped outcomes. These insights inform how learning strategies might be more effectively embedded in introductory math to support success and equity in STEM pathways, particularly in post-COVID educational contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.