Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41149142›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2025

Time Perspective Profile and Study Engagement.

Zara-Anna Mathieu, Emilie Dujardin, Nicolas Noiret, Rébecca Shankland, Marie-Amélie Martinie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zara-Anna MathieuCeRCA (Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage), Université de Poitiers, Université de Tours, CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), 86000 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0009-0004-5876-1619
Emilie DujardinCeRCA (Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage), Université de Poitiers, Université de Tours, CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), 86000 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3904-6458
Nicolas NoiretCeRCA (Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage), Université de Poitiers, Université de Tours, CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), 86000 Poitiers, France.
Rébecca ShanklandDIPHE (Développement Individu Processus Handicap Education), Université Lyon 2, 69676 Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9182-5483
Marie-Amélie MartinieCeRCA (Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage), Université de Poitiers, Université de Tours, CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), 86000 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9731-6834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Academic dropout in French universities is significant. The lack of study engagement partly explains this phenomenon. Pursuing academic studies requires switching effectively among temporal orientations (past, present, and future). Although the relationships between study engagement and each temporal orientation have been studied, to the best of our knowledge, the association of all temporal profiles (present in all individuals) has not been considered in the relationship with study engagement. This study aimed to address this gap in the literature. In total, 451 French first- and second-year students enrolled in the humanities and social sciences Bachelor's program completed a questionnaire including scales measuring time perspectives and study engagement. Using latent profile analyse, we obtained five profiles. We considered three of these as problematic profiles, including 40% of the students, and two had no problematic profiles. Among the latter, there is one in which 26% of the students are relatively oriented toward all temporal dimensions, and one balanced profile including 33% of the students. As expected, the balanced time perspective profile presented the highest study engagement scores, unlike past negative profiles, which showed lower scores. We discuss the implications of this new result for student academic success.

Indexed as

balanced time perspectivestudy engagementtemporal perspective

Identifiers

PMID41149142
PMCPMC12563791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.