Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41149139›Full record

ReviewAdvances in respiratory medicine2025

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.

Samiksha Jain, Avneet Kaur, Abdul Qadeer, Victor Ghosh, Shivani Thota, Mallareddy Banala, Jieun Lee, Gayathri Yerrapragada, Poonguzhali Elangovan, Mohammed Naveed Shariff and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Advancing the diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension-a Brazilian perspective aligned with global standards.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Samiksha JainGuntur Medical College, Guntur 522004, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9258-3159
Avneet KaurDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Abdul QadeerDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-2211-200X
Victor GhoshAndhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam 530002, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0914-1056
Shivani ThotaKamineni Institute of Technology and Sciences, Hyderabad 508254, Telangana, India.
Mallareddy BanalaDepartment of Radiology, University of Miami/Jackson Health System, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-0774-174X
Jieun LeeDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Gayathri YerrapragadaDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Poonguzhali ElangovanDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Mohammed Naveed ShariffDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-2430-7370
Thangeswaran NatarajanDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-6640-7942
Jayarajasekaran JanarthananDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Jayavinamika Jayapradhaban KalaDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Samuel RichardDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Saai Poornima VommiDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Shiva Sankari KaruppiahDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Anjani MuthyalaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
Vivek N IyerDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6441-9319
Scott A HelgesonDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7590-2293
Dipankar MitraDepartment of Computer Science & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA.
Shivaram P ArunachalamDigital Engineering & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (DEAL), Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3251-5415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) is a life-threatening vascular complication of SSc, marked by high morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis remains a major challenge due to nonspecific symptoms and the limitations of conventional tools such as echocardiography (ECHO), pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and serum biomarkers. This review evaluates the emerging role of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), in improving the diagnostic landscape of SSc-PAH. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Embase and Google Scholar to identify studies involving AI applications in SSc, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and their intersection. Evidence indicates that AI models can assist interpretation across modalities, including heart sounds, ECGs, chest X-rays (CXRs), ECHOs, CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), and omics-based biomarkers. While several models show encouraging diagnostic performance, their accuracy varies by dataset and modality, and most require external validation against right heart catheterization (RHC)-confirmed cohorts. Integrating multimodal data through AI frameworks may enhance early recognition and individualized risk stratification; however, these tools remain exploratory. Future work should emphasize harmonized hemodynamic definitions, transparent validation protocols, and SSc-specific datasets to ensure clinical applicability and reproducibility.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHypertension, PulmonaryPulmonary Arterial HypertensionScleroderma, SystemicDeep LearningHumansartificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningpulmonary arterial hypertensionsystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID41149139
PMCPMC12561522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.