ReviewDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Radiologists' Guide to Spinal Separation Surgery: What Does the Surgeon Want to Know?
Review in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal tumours are an uncommon but significant cause of pain, fractures, instability, and cord compression, leading to poor quality of life and mortality. Separation surgery is a rapidly advancing technique that has seen increased utilisation in the field of spinal oncology surgery. Separation surgery can be described as a resection technique that decompresses the spinal cord whilst creating an ablative target for high-dose stereotactic radiotherapy to achieve durable local control while minimising the risk of radiation myelopathy. This has facilitated the delivery of stereotactic radiotherapy, as well as created potential for use in managing primary bone tumours of the spine. From a radiology standpoint, optimal outcomes depend on meticulous preoperative characterisation of tumour volume and stability (e.g., ESCC grade and SINS), clear communication of anatomic constraints relevant to approach and fixation, and systematic postoperative surveillance to distinguish expected postoperative appearances from early recurrence or complications. We present our radiological experience and report recommendations while evaluating spinal oncology separation surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.