ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Cross-Group EEG Emotion Recognition Based on Phase Space Reconstruction Topology.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emotion Recognition Based on Fusion of Topological Features and Trajectory Images Derived from EEG Phase Space Reconstruction.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the interference of artifacts and the nonlinearity of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, the extraction of representational features has become a challenge in EEG emotion recognition. In this work, we reduce the dimensionality of phase space trajectories by introducing local linear embedding (LLE), which projects the trajectories onto a 2-D plane while preserving their local topological structure, and innovatively construct 16 topological features from different perspectives to quantitatively describe the nonlinear dynamic patterns induced by emotions on a multi-scale level. By using independent feature evaluation, we select core features with significant discrimination and combine the activation patterns of brain topography with model gain ranking to optimize the electrode channels. Validation of the SEED and HIED datasets resulted in subject-dependent average accuracies of 90.33% for normal-hearing subjects (3-Class) and 77.17% for hearing-impaired subjects (4-Class), and we also used differential entropy (DE) features to explore the potential of integrating topological features. By quantifying topological features, the 6-Class task achieved an average accuracy of 77.5% in distinguishing emotions across different subject groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.