Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41148962›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Applying Computational Engineering Modeling to Analyze the Social Impact of Conflict and Violent Events.

Felix Schwebel, Sebastian Meynen, Manuel García-Herranz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Felix SchwebelHWI, Ulmenliet 20, University of Hamburg/Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 21033 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-0864-9966
Sebastian MeynenHWI, Ulmenliet 20, University of Hamburg/Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 21033 Hamburg, Germany.
Manuel García-HerranzUNICEF, 3 United Nations Plaza, New York, NY 10017, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4252-4975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the societal impacts of armed conflict remains challenging due to limitations in current models, which often apply fixed-radius buffers or composite indices that obscure critical dynamics. These approaches struggle to account for indirect effects, cumulative damage, and context-specific vulnerabilities, especially the question of why similar events produce vastly different outcomes across regions. We introduce a novel computational framework that applies principles from engineering and material science to conflict analysis. Communities are modeled as elastic plates, "social fabrics", whose physical properties (thickness, elasticity, coupling) are derived from spatial socioeconomic indicators. Conflict events are treated as external forces that deform this fabric, enabling the simulation of how repeated shocks propagate and accumulate. Using a custom Python-based finite element analysis implementation, we demonstrate how heterogeneous data sources can be integrated into a unified, interpretable model. Validation tests confirm theoretical behaviors, while a proof-of-concept application to Nigeria (2018) reveals emergent patterns of spillover, nonlinear accumulation, and context-sensitive impacts. This framework offers a rigorous method to distinguish structural vulnerability from external shocks and provides a tool for understanding how conflict interacts with local conditions, bridging physical modeling and social science to better capture the multifaceted nature of conflict impacts.

Indexed as

conflict analysisconflict impactfinite element analysismathematical modelingresilience modelingsocial fabricsocial vulnerabilityspatial analysis

Identifiers

PMID41148962
PMCPMC12562815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.