ReviewCells2025
Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres: A Prognostic Paradox in Cancer.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Twisting the End Game: How Telomere Chromatin Modifications Shape Telomere Maintenance.Aging cell · 2026Review
- Interaction of flavonoids with DNA: implications in cancer treatment.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telomere maintenance enables unlimited cell proliferation by counteracting telomere erosion. While the majority of tumors activate telomerase, a significant subset-approximately 10-15%-utilizes alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT), a recombination-based mechanism. ALT-positive cancers are classically associated with genomic instability, anaphase bridges, chromosomal rearrangements, and resistance to DNA-damaging therapies. This process is closely associated with genetic instability, which contributes to chromosomal rearrangements and tumor evolution. Consequently, ALT has traditionally been considered an adverse prognostic marker in aggressive malignancies such as osteosarcoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and high-grade sarcomas. Paradoxically, recent evidence demonstrates that ALT positivity correlates with improved survival in glioblastoma (GBM) and chondrosarcoma, two tumor types that have historically been regarded as immune-cold and therapeutically intractable. This favorable outcome likely reflects a convergence of factors, including replication stress and DNA damage that impose a fitness cost in slow-growing or metabolically constrained tumors. Loss of ATRX/DAXX, while enabling ALT, further amplifies chromatin fragility, and ALT-mediated instability may paradoxically enhance immunogenicity within immune-quiescent microenvironments. Moreover, ALT-positive cells exhibit unique therapeutic vulnerabilities, particularly to ATR and PARP inhibitors. Together, these observations support a context-dependent model in which ALT functions as a double-edged sword, acting as a driver of malignant aggressiveness in rapidly proliferating cancers while serving as a relative liability in slower-growing, immune-cold tumors. Understanding this duality not only refines prognostic stratification but also opens opportunities for precision oncology. By integrating ALT-specific biomarkers into clinical workflows and exploiting ALT-related DNA repair dependencies, clinicians may transform a once uniformly negative prognostic factor into an actionable therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.