Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41148547›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2026

Phylogenetic Analysis of Porcine Circovirus Type 2 in Wild Boars from Argentina.

Macarena Marta Williman, Melisa Negrelli Pilar, Diana Sofía Ozaeta, Santiago Emanuel Colina, Mariana Alejandra Machuca, Bruno Nicolás Carpinetti, Javier Alejandro Cappuccio, María Gabriela Echeverría, Germán Ernesto Metz, María Soledad Serena

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Macarena Marta Williman *Laboratorio de Virología, Centro de Microbiología Básica y Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Melisa Negrelli Pilar *Laboratorio de Patología Especial Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Diana Sofía OzaetaFacultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Cátedra de Producción Porcina, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Santiago Emanuel ColinaLaboratorio de Virología, Centro de Microbiología Básica y Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Mariana Alejandra MachucaLaboratorio de Patología Especial Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
Bruno Nicolás CarpinettiInstituto de Ciencias Sociales y Administración, Universidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche, Florencio Varela, Argentina.
Javier Alejandro CappuccioActividad Privada, Córdoba, Argentina.
María Gabriela EcheverríaLaboratorio de Virología, Centro de Microbiología Básica y Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina. mariagabrielaecheverria@yahoo.com.ar.ORCID 0000-0001-9644-3583
Germán Ernesto Metz *Laboratorio de Virología, Centro de Microbiología Básica y Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.
María Soledad Serena *Laboratorio de Virología, Centro de Microbiología Básica y Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2019-2756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PCV2 ORF 2 is highly variable and allows classification of PCV2 in eight genotypes, with type 'b' and 'd' being the most prevalent in domestic swine. Wild boars are considered an important reservoir of viruses, and for this reason, our goal is to investigate the genetic diversity of PCV2 in Argentina. A total of 152 animals were captured in two seasons according to national disposition. Blood, lung, heart, kidney, spleen, liver, and lymph node samples were obtained from each animal and analyzed by virological and molecular methods. From the total samples collected during 2018-2019, 11.53% were detected as PCV2 positive by PCR. However, in 2022-2023, the percentage of positivity was 52.7% by PCR. By ELISA test, the total of positive samples from 2018 to 2019 was 71 (91%), and 55 (74%) in 2022-2023. PCV2 antigens were detected by immunohistochemistry only in the lymph node samples. From all positive PCR samples, seven sequences of the complete ORF2 gene were obtained; five were closely related to wild boar type 'd' strains from China and Italy, with an amino acid identity in the range of 99.14-100%, and two sequences clustered with PCV2 type 'a', showing an identity between 96.54 and 99.56% with a strain from Canada.

Indexed as

Circoviridae InfectionsCircovirusSus scrofaAnimalsArgentinaEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGenetic VariationGenotypePhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionSwineArgentinaBahía de SamborombónPorcine circovirus 2Wild boars

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.