ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2025
Applications of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontics: a narrative review.
Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- AI in orthodontic treatment planning: a systematic review comparing learning approaches.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Stakeholder experience with artificial intelligence in healthcare: a bibliometric study of satisfaction, trust, acceptance, and patient engagement.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Considerations in Using Artificial Intelligence to Simulate Orthodontic Treatment for Implant-Prosthetic Purposes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Orthodontic Malocclusion Detection Using Multiple AI Models: A Comparative Study.Healthcare informatics research · 2026Article
- CBCT-Based Orthodontic Classification Using Commercial AI: Completeness and Accuracy in Independent Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently gained significant interest in orthodontics due to its ability to enhance diagnostic accuracy, guide treatment planning, and improve therapeutic outcomes. This review aimed to explore the relevance and applications of AI across various aspects of orthodontics. A comprehensive literature search was performed from January 2010 to 1 March 2025 in databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane. Letters to the editor, case reports, systematic reviews, and animal studies were excluded. Artificial intelligence models, especially those using deep learning, have been integrated into multiple orthodontic fields, including landmark identification, malocclusion classification, treatment planning, growth prediction, and risk assessment. They have also achieved notable success in segmenting two-dimensional and three-dimensional anatomical structures, aligner therapy, evaluating facial asymmetry, localizing impacted canines, and identifying clefts. While several investigations highlight the high accuracy of AI models, others emphasize the need for clinician oversight, recommending that these tools serve as a supportive tool rather than a replacement for clinical judgment. AI-based algorithms may enhance treatment quality, decrease procedural time and operator variability, and reduce human error. However, further clinical trials are needed to validate and optimize the accuracy and reliability of these models in orthodontics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.