ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Indications for home mechanical ventilation in children: changes over four decades.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Home Non-Invasive Ventilation as an Alternative to Tracheostomy in Infants With Moderate-to-Severe Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Article
- Characteristics of Pediatric Patients With Home Mechanical Ventilation in a Japanese Regional Core Hospital.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Home mechanical ventilation (HMV) has been used for more than 40 years in the Netherlands. With this retrospective single-center study, we aimed to evaluate the demographics of children supported by HMV and changes in indications and type of support. We retrieved relevant data of all patients younger than 19 years who started HMV between 1979 and 2023 from a prospective database and from medical notes. A total of 544 children started with HMV (median age 13.1 years (IQR 5-16)). After a rapid increase between 1979 and 2017, the number of children treated with HMV stabilized. Nearly 40% of patients started HMV unplanned, because of failed weaning off the ventilator after surgery or an infection. Thirty percent of all children started with invasive ventilation. A majority of patients had a neuromuscular disorder (NMD) (n = 305, 56%) or a genetic syndrome (n = 85, 16%). The relative contribution of other diseases than NMDs increased in the 21th century. The relative number of patients younger than 5 years using HMV increased significantly over the years, from 13% in 1989-1998 to 30% in 2014-2022. This increase was even more pronounced for children using non-invasive ventilation (NIV), i.e. < 4% till 2003 and 30% in 2019-2022.
conclusionThis large longitudinal cohort study shows that the number of children requiring HMV remains stable but that the relative number of young children using HMV and the causes of chronic respiratory failure changed over the years. Also, NIV became the predominant mode in children starting HMV. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The number of children with home mechanical ventilation increased over the last decades. • Neuromuscular diseases are the most common reason for starting home mechanical ventilation. WHAT IS NEW: • The number of children requiring home mechanical ventilation remained stable in recent years. • The relative number of children younger than 5 years using home mechanical ventilation, in particular non-invasive ventilation, increased over the years. • Causes of chronic respiratory failure necessitating home mechanical ventilation changed over the years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.