ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy: a multicenter matched case-control study by the RIRSearch Study Group.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to assess the outcomes of various perioperative management strategies employed during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in patients receiving anticoagulant (AC) or antiplatelet (AP) therapy.
methodsIn this multicenter retrospective matched case–control study, we included patients with nephrolithiasis who received AC or AP therapy and underwent RIRS. The control group consisted of patients not receiving AC/AP therapy. Group 1 included patients who discontinued AC/AP treatment prior to RIRS, whereas Group 2 comprised patients who also discontinued AC/AP therapy but received bridging anticoagulation. The primary endpoints were surgical success and RIRS-related complications. These outcomes were assessed using non-contrast abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scans obtained during the first postoperative month.
resultsIn the final analysis, Group 1 and Group 2 each comprised 50 patients, while the control group consisted of 56 patients. The mean age was 59.36 ± 8.86 years in Group 1, 59.96 ± 9.70 years in Group 2, and 56.59 ± 11.56 years in the control group (p = 0.452). Surgical success was significantly lower in Group 2 (p = 0.026), and the need for auxiliary procedures was significantly higher in this group (p = 0.009). Although perioperative complications tended to be higher in Group 2 (p = 0.053), no statistically significant differences were observed in postoperative or overall complication rates.
conclusionsPatients undergoing RIRS with bridging anticoagulation demonstrated lower surgical success rates and a higher need for auxiliary procedures. These findings underscore the importance of close monitoring and individualized perioperative management in this high-risk patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41148357What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.