Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41148327›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Organ preservation or radical surgery? Modern surgical concepts within the complex interplay between function and oncology].

Miriam Spreda, Chris Protzel

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miriam SpredaKlinik für Urologie, Helios Kliniken Schwerin GmbH, Wismarsche Straße 393-397, 19049, Schwerin, Deutschland.
Chris ProtzelKlinik für Urologie, Helios Kliniken Schwerin GmbH, Wismarsche Straße 393-397, 19049, Schwerin, Deutschland. chris.protzel@helios-gesundheit.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile cancer is a rare yet highly aggressive urological malignancy, the management of which has undergone a fundamental paradigm shift in recent years. Organ-preserving strategies have gained increasing importance and, particularly in early-stage disease, provide an oncologically safe alternative to radical surgery. This article examines the stage-specific management of the primary tumor, integrating current guideline recommendations, surgical techniques, and functional as well as psychosocial considerations. Special attention is given to the role of intraoperative frozen section analysis, the determination of adequate surgical margins, and the prognostic significance of local recurrence for overall survival. The findings underscore the necessity of individualized, risk-adapted treatment planning within specialized centers.

Indexed as

Organ Sparing TreatmentsPenile NeoplasmsHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionFrozen section diagnosisLocal recurrencePenile neoplasmsPenis cancerPrecancerous lesions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.