Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41148275›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Can proximal junctional failure be predicted after adult spinal deformity surgery by experienced deformity surgeons based on patient, surgical and radiographic parameters?

Marc Khalifé, Ayman Mohamed, David Ben-Israel, Joshua T Bunch, Alan H Daniels, Bassel G Diebo, Robert Eastlack, Richard G Fessler, Munish C Gupta, Kojo Hamilton and 16 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Marc KhaliféHôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France. marc.khalife@aphp.fr.
Ayman MohamedLenox Hill Hospital, New York, United States.
David Ben-IsraelUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States.
Joshua T BunchNorton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, United States.
Alan H DanielsUniversity Orthopedics, Providence, United States.
Bassel G DieboUniversity Orthopedics, Providence, United States.
Robert EastlackScripps Clinic Torrey Pines, La Jolla, United States.
Richard G FesslerRush University Medical Center, Chicago, United States.
Munish C GuptaWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States.
Kojo HamiltonUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States.
Richard HostinSouthwest Scoliosis and Spine Institute, Dallas, United States.
Han Jo KimHospital for Special Surgery, New York, United States.
Eric O KlinebergUniversity of Texas Health, Houston, United States.
Lawrence G LenkeColumbia University Medical Center, NewYork- Presbyterian Och Spine Hospital, New York, United States.
Jeffrey MullinUniversity at Buffalo, Buffalo, United States.
Praveen V MummaneniUniversity of California, San Francisco, United States.
Pierce NunleySpine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, United States.
Paul ParkUniversity of Tennessee, Memphis, United States.
Peter G PassiasDuke University, Durham, United States.
Justin S SmithUniversity of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, United States.
Alekos A TheologisUniversity of California, San Francisco, United States.
Mitsuru YagiInternational University of Health and Welfare, Ōtawara, Japan.
Renaud LafageLenox Hill Hospital, New York, United States.
Frank J SchwabLenox Hill Hospital, New York, United States.
Virginie LafageLenox Hill Hospital, New York, United States.
Issg International Spine Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the ability of experienced spine surgeons to predict the occurrence of proximal junctional failure (PJF) within the first 2 years following ASD surgery, based on patient, surgical, and pre-discharge radiographic evaluation.

methodsThis case-based survey sent to spinal deformity surgeons included ASD patients who underwent correction-fusion surgery with a minimum follow-up of one year. Twenty patients who underwent posterior fusion and required PJF revision were identified. Another 20 patients with similar characteristics but without PJF served as a control group. Detailed patient vignettes included demographics, frailty assessment, medical history, DEXA, and Health-Related Quality of Life scores. Surgical details covered instrumentation, procedures, approach, graft use, osteotomies, cage incorporation, and PJF prophylaxis. Pre-operative and post-operative radiographs were provided. A panel of 21 experts in spine deformity surgery was then tasked to review these vignettes. The experts were instructed to offer qualitative predictions regarding the risk of failure, choosing from six possibilities ranging from "Extremely likely" to "Extremely unlikely." Metrics for prediction quality (sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy) were analyzed. Furthermore, they were asked to provide insights into the factors influencing their predictions.

resultsThe median follow-up for these cases was 2 years. The median time to failure was 5.5 months (Range: 2 to 20 months). Of 782 predictions, only 136 were extreme (i.e., either "Extremely likely" or "Extremely unlikely" categories); most responses were uncertain, with 42.8% expressing predictions of being somewhat likely or unlikely to fail. Overall, prediction accuracy varied between experts (37% to 65%), precision ranged from 40% to 69%, and sensitivity ranged from 35% to 100%. Aggregating consensus instead of individual answers, the prediction accuracy was 61%, precision 67%, and sensitivity 50%. Only four experts demonstrated accuracy above the consensus results, and one exhibited better precision. Factors influencing predictions included post-operative sagittal alignment for success and various patient factors (age, BMI, frailty, bone quality) for PJF.

conclusionsExperienced spinal deformity surgeons have a poor ability to predict PJK and PJF. Expert predictions varied, with consensus achieving 61% accuracy. Factors influencing predictions included post-operative sagittal alignment for success and patient-related factors for PJF. The findings highlight the complexity of predicting PJF, emphasizing the need for improved risk assessment tools in ASD surgery planning.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsScoliosisSpinal CurvaturesSpinal FusionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyTreatment FailureAdult spinal deformityMechanical complicationsProximal junctional failureProximal junctional kyphosisSurvey

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.