ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Outcomes of aquablation: pooled analysis from the WATER, WATER II, OPEN WATER, FRANCAIS WATER, and JAPAN PMS studies.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phase-specific workflow maturation during early institutional implementation of Aquablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a retrospective single-center study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of Aquablation outcomes across surgeon experience levels: A descriptive analysis of published studies.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Aquablation/AquaBeam Waterjet Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Three-Year Functional and Ejaculatory Outcomes in a Multicenter Real-World Italian Cohort.Lower urinary tract symptoms · 2026Article
- The learning curve of waterjet ablation of the prostate: a cumulative sum analysis of surgical and functional outcomes.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- The core aquablation pentafecta: a five-domain composite definition of procedural success and learning curve validation in 300 consecutive cases.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAquablation is a novel surgical technique for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).This analysis consolidates data from five international studies-WATER, WATER II, OPEN WATER, FRANCAIS WATER, and JAPAN PMS-to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of Aquablation.
methodsData from 528 patients with symptomatic BPH were pooled from five prospective, multinational studies. Outcomes included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual volume (PVR). Measurements were recorded at baseline and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-procedure.
resultsAt baseline, patients had a mean age of 67.8 ± 7.7 years and a mean prostate volume of 71.7 ± 32.0 mL (range 20-242 ml). The mean IPSS decreased significantly from 21.5 ± 7.3 at baseline to 5.8 ± 5.0 at 6 months and stabilized at 6.6 ± 5.5 by 12 months. QoL scores improved from 4.7 ± 1.2 at baseline to 1.4 ± 1.5 at 6 and 12 months. Qmax increased from 8.1 ± 5.0 mL/s to 19.0 ± 11.1 mL/s at 3 months and 20.5 ± 11.0 mL/s at 12 months. PVR decreased from 105.9 ± 106.9 mL at baseline to 53.1 ± 68.1 mL at 12 months. Voided volume improved from 197.5 ± 101.9 mL at baseline to 271.9 ± 151.9 mL at 12 months.
conclusionAquablation demonstrates sustained improvements in BPH symptoms, quality of life, and urodynamic parameters over a 12-month period. This analysis supports Aquablation as a safe and effective treatment for BPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41148264What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.