Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41148192›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025

Cerebral venous outflow revisited: Contemporary insights to simplify a complex disease.

Kyle M Fargen, Charles Stout, Jan Vargas, Omar Ashraf, Adnan Siddiqui, Ferdinand K Hui

Expression of concernAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kyle M FargenDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Charles StoutDepartment of Neurointerventional Radiology, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA.
Jan VargasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC, USA.
Omar AshrafDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-5385-3785
Adnan SiddiquiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, SUNY University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Ferdinand K HuiDivision of Neurointerventional Surgery, The Neuroscience Institute, The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral venous outflow disorders represent an underrecognized spectrum of conditions in which impaired venous drainage contributes to intracranial hypertension and a variety of neurological symptoms. Traditional perspectives have emphasized cerebrospinal fluid pressure as the dominant pathophysiologic driver, but emerging evidence highlights the central role of venous congestion in promoting dysfunction through mechanisms including venous hypertension, impaired glymphatic clearance, cerebral swelling, and potential neurotoxicity from stagnant flow. The venous system can be seen as a waste management network, with jugular and extra-jugular pathways variably influenced by static and dynamic compression. Outflow insufficiency may result in global or regional cerebral flow deficits, the magnitude and duration of which correlate with symptom severity. Variability between individuals, genetic and anatomical, may explain the differing thresholds at which a person develops symptoms. Surgical approaches such as jugular stenting or styloidectomy aim to enhance venous drainage, thereby reducing flow deficits and improving symptoms. By reframing cerebral venous physiology into simplified models, this work provides a conceptual foundation for further study and therapeutic innovation in cerebral venous outflow disorders.

Indexed as

Idiopathic intracranial hypertensioninternal jugular veinjugular stentstyloidectomyvenous outflow disorder

Identifiers

PMID41148192
PMCPMC12568555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.