Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41148170›Full record

SynthesisSchizophrenia bulletin2026

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials of Anti-Inflammatory Agents in Early-Stage Psychotic Disorders.

Edward R Palmer, Matthew J Taylor, James E Hotham, David Salam, Ghayath Alshawaf, Jack C Rogers, Rachel Upthegrove

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edward R PalmerInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Matthew J TaylorMental Health Research Unit, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, United Kingdom.
James E HothamInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
David SalamInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Ghayath AlshawafInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Jack C RogersInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Rachel UpthegroveInstitute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.

Funding

Mental Health Translational Research CollaborationNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesisAccumulating evidence suggests that immune dysregulation is present in psychosis, however, evidence for anti-inflammatory treatments is mixed. This may be because studies need to focus on when inflammation offers a modifiable target. This review and meta-analysis sought to clarify the effects of anti-inflammatory agents from high-quality randomized trials in patients at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) and first-episode of psychosis (FEP). STUDY

designDatabases were searched until January 2025 for double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating the effect of anti-inflammatory treatment compared with placebo in CHR and FEP populations. Primary outcomes were transition rates to psychosis in CHR and changes in total psychotic symptoms in FEP. Secondary outcomes included changes in symptoms in CHR and changes in symptom sub-scores in FEP. STUDY

resultsSearches retrieved 2168 articles, with 17 meeting inclusion criteria (5 for CHR, 12 for FEP). In CHR, anti-inflammatory treatment was not associated with a significant reduction in transition to psychosis (odds ratio 0.88, 95% CI, 0.26-3.01, P = .80). In FEP, anti-inflammatory treatment demonstrated a significant reduction in total psychotic symptoms; (standardized mean differences = -0.38, 95% CI, -0.76 to 0.00, P = .05). Secondary outcomes showed no change in symptoms in CHR, and significant changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale positive sub-scores in FEP.

conclusionsAdjuvant anti-inflammatory treatment may be efficacious in FEP. However, high heterogeneity was present across studies, with possible publication bias and small-study effects. We highlight the need for further, large, stage-specific trials to conclusively understand the potential therapeutic benefit of anti-inflammatory treatments in early psychosis.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychotic DisordersHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Inflammatory Agentsanti-inflammatory treatmentclinical high riskearly psychosisfirst-episode psychosis

Identifiers

PMID41148170
PMCPMC13645840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.