Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41147990›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2025

Acute Presentations of Colorectal Cancer: An International Prospective Snapshot on Management and Outcomes.

EuroSurg Collaborative, STARSurg Collaborative

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

EuroSurg Collaborative
STARSurg Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with colorectal cancer (CRC) present as an emergency in one-third of cases. This international snapshot study describes the presentation, treatment, and overall outcomes of patients admitted acutely to hospital with CRC.

methodsAcute presentation of colorectal cancer-an international snapshot (APOLLO) was a prospective, international, cohort study enrolling consecutive patients admitted acutely to hospital with CRC from January to June 2023. The primary outcome was mortality at 90 days. Reasons for acute CRC presentation are described, as are the rates of surgical and nonsurgical management and mortality.

resultsOverall, 1861 patients (257 centers, 39 countries) were included (median age 70 years; females 44.8%). Rates of obstruction (54.5%; 1015 of 1861) and perforation (11.4%; 212 of 1861) are quantified. In total, 59.2% of patients were managed with curative intent (1102 of 1861). Curative management of right colon cancer predominantly involved resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) (78.5%). Curative management of left colon cancer predominantly involved either RPA or resection with end stoma formation (RES) (42.9% vs. 40.6%). Acute curative rectal cancer management strategies were more heterogeneous (RPA 21.8%, RES 26.7%, diverting stoma only 15.8%, no surgery 31.5%). Overall 90-day mortality was 17.5% (326 of 1861) and lower in those undergoing curative intent surgery (69 [7.3%] of 949).

conclusionThis international prospective snapshot study found a 17.5% 90-day mortality in patients presenting acutely with CRC, predominantly for obstruction. High levels of variation in the management of acutely presenting left colon cancer and rectal cancer are highlighted.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntestinal ObstructionMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAPOLLObowel obstructionbowel perforationcolorectal canceremergency surgeryglobal surgery

Identifiers

PMID41147990
PMCPMC12690004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.