ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2026
The Relationship Between HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Use and Laboratory-Confirmed Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection Positivity Among a Diverse, Multi-City Cohort of Sexually Active Sexual and Gender Minorities in the United States.
Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovations and Challenges in Syphilis Screening and Prevention Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Scoping Review.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026Article
- Differential effects of primary and latent syphilis co-infection on immune reconstitution and virological failure in HIV-positive adults on ART.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The presence of chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis infection is a significant risk factor for HIV acquisition and transmission and disproportionately impacts men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women. While HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) reduces HIV risk, its use may influence sexual behaviors, potentially increasing sexually transmitted infection (STI) exposure. Conversely, PrEP users are often more engaged in care, regularly screened and treated for STIs, and may access other prevention tools such as doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis. Studies on the relationship between PrEP use and STIs have shown mixed results. This cross-sectional analysis included 392 participants (381 cisgender MSM; 11 transgender women) enrolled in the US-based Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study/WIHS Combined Cohort Study between 2021 and 2024 who were sexually active in the year prior to STI testing and HIV negative at their most recent study visit. We assessed whether bacterial STI positivity (i.e., laboratory-confirmed chlamydia and gonorrhea at the urethral, pharyngeal, and/or rectal sites and/or current/past syphilis infection) differed by current PrEP use (yes/no). Multi-variable logistic regression models included sociodemographic and behavioral covariates that were associated with bacterial STI positivity at
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.