Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41147855›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026

Prior osteosynthesis-unlike osteotomy-raises revision risk after total knee arthroplasty, predominantly via periprosthetic infection.

Nele Wagener, Yinan Wu, Alexander Grimberg, Christian Hipfl, Sebastian Hardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nele WagenerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4012-1363
Yinan WuEPRD Deutsche Endoprothesenregister gGmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4200-8065
Alexander GrimbergEPRD Deutsche Endoprothesenregister gGmbH, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8062-788X
Christian HipflCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2538-7566
Sebastian HardtCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8774-7585

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious knee surgery is discussed as a risk factor for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet most reports do not distinguish between osteotomy and osteosynthesis. The German Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel (OPS)-based classification was used to compare the impact of these procedures on implant survival, mortality and complications after primary TKA.

methodsData from the German Arthroplasty Registry (2012-2024) were used. Patients with prior osteosynthesis (n = 10,078) and prior osteotomy (n = 96,782) were each 1:1 Mahalanobis-matched to controls without prior knee surgery (matching on age, sex, Elixhauser score, body mass index [BMI], fixation, arthroplasty type and bearing mobility). Primary endpoints were all-cause revision and mortality; secondary endpoints were periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), periprosthetic fracture and aseptic loosening. Kaplan-Meier with 95% log-log confidence intervals (CI) and log-rank tests were used; Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs).

resultsAll-cause revision differed for osteosynthesis versus controls (log-rank p < 0.001) but not for osteotomy (p = 0.972). In Cox models, prior osteosynthesis was associated with a higher revision hazard (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.52-2.15; p < 0.001). For osteotomy, no increased revision hazard was observed across age (<65/≥65 years) or comorbidity (Elixhauser < 3/≥3) strata. Mortality was higher after osteosynthesis (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.34-1.64; p < 0.001), while osteotomy showed no overall increase; PJI occurred more often after osteosynthesis (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.21-2.19). Periprosthetic fracture (HR 8.54, 95% CI 3.02-24.1) and aseptic loosening (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.24-4.59) were likewise increased after osteosynthesis.

conclusionsPrior osteosynthesis increases revision risk after TKA-predominantly via infection-whereas prior osteotomy does not. These findings support extended perioperative infection workup, staged hardware removal when indicated and careful implant selection in patients with prior osteosynthesis; outcomes after osteotomy are comparable to primary osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective observational study.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFracture Fixation, InternalOsteotomyProsthesis-Related InfectionsReoperationAgedFemaleGermanyHumansKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedPeriprosthetic FracturesProsthesis FailureRegistriesRisk Factorsnational registry studyosteosynthesisosteotomyperiprosthetic joint infectionrevision risktotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41147855
PMCPMC13418327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.