Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41147788›Full record

ArticlePlant & cell physiology2026

Versatile genome editing using Type I-E CRISPR-Cas3 in rice.

Hiroaki Saika, Naho Hara, Shuhei Yasumoto, Toshiya Muranaka, Kazuto Yoshimi, Tomoji Mashimo, Seiichi Toki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant & cell physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hiroaki SaikaDivision of Crop Genome Editing Research, Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 3-1-3, Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8604, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0716-2518
Naho HaraDivision of Crop Genome Editing Research, Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 3-1-3, Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8604, Japan.
Shuhei YasumotoDepartment of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Osaka, 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Toshiya MuranakaDepartment of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Osaka, 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1058-2473
Kazuto YoshimiDivision of Animal Genetics, Laboratory Animal Research Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639,  Japan.
Tomoji MashimoDivision of Animal Genetics, Laboratory Animal Research Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639,  Japan.
Seiichi TokiDivision of Crop Genome Editing Research, Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 3-1-3, Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8604, Japan.

Funding

Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution JPJ012287Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion ProgramMinistry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food JPJ008000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Type I-E CRISPR-Cas3 derived from Escherichia coli (Eco CRISPR-Cas3) can introduce large deletions in target sites and is available for mammalian genome editing. The use of Eco CRISPR-Cas3 in plants is challenging because seven CRISPR-Cas3 components (six Cas proteins and CRISPR RNA) must be expressed simultaneously in plant cells. To date, application has been limited to maize protoplasts, and no mutant plants have been produced. In this study, we developed a genome editing system in rice using Eco CRISPR-Cas3 via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Deletions in the target gene were detected in 39%-71% of transformed calli by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, and the frequency of alleles lacking a region 7.0 kb upstream of the protospacer adjacent motif sequence was estimated as 21%-61% by quantifying copy number by droplet digital PCR, suggesting that mutant plants could be obtained with reasonably high frequency. Deletions were determined in plants regenerated from transformed calli, and stably inherited to the progenies. Sequencing analysis showed that deletions of 0.1-7.2 kb were obtained, as reported previously in mammals. Interestingly, deletions separated by intervening fragments or with short insertion and inversion were also determined, suggesting the creation of novel alleles. Moreover, we demonstrated C to T base editing based on Type I-E CRISPR-Cas3 in rice, whereas base editing based on Type I-C and Type I-F2 CRISPR-Cas3 has been reported previously only in human cells. Overall, Eco CRISPR-Cas3 could be a promising genome editing tool for gene knockout, gene deletion, base editing, and genome rearrangement in plants.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenome, PlantOryzaPlants, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Cas3deletiongenome rearrangementricetargeted mutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID41147788
PMCPMC12814879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.