Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41147739›Full record

ReviewSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025

Toward Sustainable and High-Performing Energy Storage from Biomass Waste Through Hydrothermal Carbonization.

Hong Duc Pham, Tristan Shelley, Paulomi Polly Burey, Pratheep Kumar Annamalai, Jessica Feldman, Tan Tien Nguyen, Andreas Helwig, Ashok Kumar Nanjundan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hong Duc PhamCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4467-5141
Tristan ShelleyCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4812-0285
Paulomi Polly BureyCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9248-2307
Pratheep Kumar AnnamalaiCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7284-0813
Jessica FeldmanCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350, Australia.
Tan Tien NguyenKey Laboratory of Digital Control and System Engineering (DCSELab), Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.
Andreas HelwigCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350, Australia.
Ashok Kumar NanjundanCentre for Future Materials, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6502-0844

Funding

Australian Department of Education through a Regional Research Collaboration SIMPLEHubAustralian Research Council through the ARC Research Hub for Safe and Reliable Energy (SafeREnergy IH200100035)University of Southern Queensland CapacityBuildingGrantUniversity of Southern Queensland Early Career Researcher Program seed grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demand for valuable and sustainable chemicals and nonfossil fuels, with a carbon-neutral or zero-carbon footprint from zero-cost, abundant waste streams, has garnered significant interest in recent years. This has been driven by a global desire to transition to a circular economy, by reducing global reliance and eventually the need for fossil-based resources. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC), a thermal conversion technology, is widely used to recover carbon and energy from waste, avoiding the energy-intensive drying process for high-moisture feedstock, and operating at lower temperatures than conventional processes. The main product, waste-derived hydrochar (WHC), has attracted growing interest in electrochemical energy storage (EES) devices (e.g., rechargeable batteries and supercapacitors) due to its straightforward process, favorable properties, high carbon conversion, and environmental benefits. Hence, this critical review will provide the reader with a better understanding of the principles, technical feasibility, and limitations of carbon conversion from waste through various conversion pathways. Moreover, it presents detailed state-of-the-art studies previously reported on WHC production using one-step direct carbonization (DC) and the two-step HTC followed by DC for electrochemical energy storage applications, with a focus on the role of WHC-based electrodes. Lastly, the challenges and prospects for developing WHC materials for EES applications are examined.

Indexed as

biomass valorizationhydrocharhydrothermal carbonizationrechargeable batteriessupercapacitors

Identifiers

PMID41147739
PMCPMC12710171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.