ArticleMolecular ecology2025
From Mud to Meat: Comparative Metabarcoding Reveals Two Different Evolutionary Paths to Carnivory in a Group of Meiofaunal Annelids.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evolutionary transitions to carnivory represent profound shifts in feeding mode that are often accompanied by widespread changes in organismal function, behaviour and ecology. Such transitions have evolved numerous times among animals, and predator-prey interactions have been major drivers of animal evolution. Despite the ecological and evolutionary importance of carnivory, the evolutionary steps leading to this feeding mode are poorly understood. Although relatively rare, lineages that have recently adopted predatory lifestyles are particularly valuable for understanding the evolution of carnivory. The annelid genus Chaetogaster, composed of small freshwater oligochaetes, is unusual in having recently evolved carnivory not just once but twice, making it an excellent model to infer evolutionary steps from detritivory to carnivory. We performed a gut-content analysis of eight Chaetogaster species and a detritivorous outgroup, using 18S rDNA metabarcoding complemented by visual gut content assessment to infer diets. We found that species within the lineages presumed to be carnivorous had large fractions of animal metabarcoding reads, as predicted. Their closest relatives, however, differed in dietary profiles. We infer that the closest relatives of one carnivorous lineage, which are generalist predators, primarily feed on ciliates, while the closest relatives of the second carnivorous lineage, which are mollusc symbionts, are detritivores. Our data suggest that carnivory evolved two ways in Chaetogaster, with one transition mediated by ciliate feeding and a second mediated by symbiosis. Overall, this study suggests that carnivory can evolve from noncarnivorous ancestors through distinct evolutionary pathways, even among closely related lineages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.