Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41147708›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2025

From Mud to Meat: Comparative Metabarcoding Reveals Two Different Evolutionary Paths to Carnivory in a Group of Meiofaunal Annelids.

Joseph M Mack, Alexandra E Bely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joseph M MackDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9017-4351
Alexandra E BelyDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 1923429University of MarylandWashington Biologist's Field Club
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary transitions to carnivory represent profound shifts in feeding mode that are often accompanied by widespread changes in organismal function, behaviour and ecology. Such transitions have evolved numerous times among animals, and predator-prey interactions have been major drivers of animal evolution. Despite the ecological and evolutionary importance of carnivory, the evolutionary steps leading to this feeding mode are poorly understood. Although relatively rare, lineages that have recently adopted predatory lifestyles are particularly valuable for understanding the evolution of carnivory. The annelid genus Chaetogaster, composed of small freshwater oligochaetes, is unusual in having recently evolved carnivory not just once but twice, making it an excellent model to infer evolutionary steps from detritivory to carnivory. We performed a gut-content analysis of eight Chaetogaster species and a detritivorous outgroup, using 18S rDNA metabarcoding complemented by visual gut content assessment to infer diets. We found that species within the lineages presumed to be carnivorous had large fractions of animal metabarcoding reads, as predicted. Their closest relatives, however, differed in dietary profiles. We infer that the closest relatives of one carnivorous lineage, which are generalist predators, primarily feed on ciliates, while the closest relatives of the second carnivorous lineage, which are mollusc symbionts, are detritivores. Our data suggest that carnivory evolved two ways in Chaetogaster, with one transition mediated by ciliate feeding and a second mediated by symbiosis. Overall, this study suggests that carnivory can evolve from noncarnivorous ancestors through distinct evolutionary pathways, even among closely related lineages.

Indexed as

AnnelidaBiological EvolutionCarnivoryDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicAnimalsDietFeeding BehaviorPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 18SRNA, Ribosomal, 18Sannelidscarnivoryfeedingfreshwatermeiofaunametabarcoding

Identifiers

PMID41147708
PMCPMC12617034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.